Functional Module Evidence Mapping · manual review step
Enrichment Mapping Reviewer
A companion review step for the Functional Module Evidence Mapping workflow. Inspect source terms and genes, record your module assignments, and save a resumable mapping for the next workflow stage.
Prototype. Engineering checks use synthetic inputs. Real-world review efficiency has not yet been evaluated. This page supports manual curation; it does not perform enrichment analysis or validate biological interpretations.
Your tables are processed locally in your browser and are not uploaded. Download a session file to save your work before leaving.
Start with the synthetic example or add your own table below.
Load evidence
No source tablesAdd an enrichment table
UTF-8 CSV or TSV. Add tables one at a time; pick the description and gene-list columns explicitly. Excel files must first be exported as CSV/TSV.
Define your modules
Replace these illustrative definitions with your own dictionary, then apply it. IDs, names, colours, and order export directly to the workflow; Unclassified is added if missing. Module_order also breaks automatic primary-module ties in the downstream workflow.
Illustrative dictionary — apply your reviewed definitions before including terms.
Colours can come from Scientific Palette Explorer. This review does not select module meanings for you.
Review terms
0 / 0 reviewedMatching is case-sensitive after trimming boundary whitespace. The same description in different sources shares one decision. Adding new evidence resets affected decisions to pending.
Add an enrichment table to begin, or try the synthetic example above. No terms are assigned automatically.
Source evidence
Adjusted p values are raw input text: not filtered, recalculated, or interpreted here. Gene chips below use the workflow's uppercase / wrapper-removal convention; original gene strings are preserved.
Reformatted gene labels
Confidence is your qualitative label, not a probability or a weight in the workflow's term counts. No module assignment or confidence is retained when a term is excluded.
Save & export
No reviewed termsSave a session to continue later. Workflow CSVs use the existing Functional Module Evidence Mapping schema. The ledger includes pending and excluded terms; the audit records revisions and fingerprints.
How this fits into the workflow
- Keep your original enrichment files unchanged.
- Use the downloaded term_to_module_mapping.csv as the workflow's term map, and module_dictionary.csv as its dictionary.
- Run the existing workflow with the original node table and enrichment inputs. Review unmatched terms and genes absent from the node table.
- Use the resulting annotation in Cytoscape Import Table Builder when needed.
This page does not run enrichment, validate biological mechanisms, compute adjusted p values, or generate a Cytoscape network. Fingerprints are change checks, not signatures. Session JSON includes your input data and reviewer notes: keep it private.